On July 21, 2021, a group of state attorneys general proposed a $26 billion settlement proposal to resolve claims that McKesson Corp., Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., and Johnson & Johnson (“J&J,” and together with McKesson Corp., Cardinal Health, Inc., and AmerisourceBergen Corp., the “Settling Parties”) contributed to the opioid epidemic in the United States.
Continue Reading Johnson & Johnson, McKesson Corp., AmerisourceBergen Corp, and Cardinal Health proceed with $26 billion Settlement with States to Resolve to Resolve Opioid Claims
Life Sciences Litigation & Enforcement Team
Invidior Pays $300M to Settle Claims that it Improperly Marketed Suboxone
On April 27, 2021, the California Attorney General announced that Invidior plc and Invidior Inc. (collectively, “Invidior”) agreed to pay $300 million to settle claims that it falsely and aggressively marketed Suboxone, a drug product approved for use in recovering opioid addicts.
…
Continue Reading Invidior Pays $300M to Settle Claims that it Improperly Marketed Suboxone
Cornerstone Research 2020 Report Identifies Trends In Securities Litigation Filings Affecting Life Sciences Firms
A recently-published report from Cornerstone Research and the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse analyzes securities class action litigation in 2020 and demonstrates both a continued focus by the plaintiffs’ bar on life science firms (including those in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology spaces), as well as specific trends in securities litigation affecting companies in…
Year-End NERA Report Shows COVID-19-Related Federal Securities Litigation Disproportionately Targeting Life Sciences Firms
A recently-published report from NERA Economic Consulting provides a look back at securities class action litigation in 2020 and demonstrates the continued focus by the plaintiffs’ bar on life science firms, particularly those centered on the development and commercialization of drugs and devices.
The report found that excluding merger objections, the Health Technology and Services…
S.D.N.Y. Rejects Proposed Amended Complaint Alleging Manufacturer Of Liver Disease Drug Intended To Commit Fraud By Not Disclosing Serious Adverse Events
Hou Liu v. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2020 WL 5441345 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2020)
On September 9, 2020, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the Southern District of New York denied a motion to amend judgment and a request for leave to file a second amended complaint following the Court’s dismissal of an action against Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and certain of its executives. The Court ruled that plaintiffs failed to identify any facts the Court overlooked in dismissing the action on March 26, 2020, and had not offered any newly-discovered evidence justifying leave to amend the complaint.…
Mid-Year NERA Report Shows COVID-19-Related Federal Securities Litigation Targeting Pharmaceutical Industry
A recently-published report from NERA Economic Consulting provides a mid-year look back at securities class actions and demonstrates the continued focus by the plaintiffs’ securities litigation bar on health care and life science firms, particularly those focused on the development and commercialization of drugs and devices.
The report found that approximately half of all COVID-19-related…
S.D.N.Y. Preliminarily Approves $1.6 Million Settlement in Class Action Concerning Development of an OxyContin Alternative
Shanawaz v. Intellipharmaceutics Int’l Inc., No. 17-CV-5761 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. July 30, 2020)
On July 30, 2020, Judge J. Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York preliminarily approved a settlement in a putative shareholder class action concerning development of an OxyContin alternative, Rexista. The parties agreed to a settlement amount of $1.6 million.…
First Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Action Regarding Statements Concerning Manufacturing of Eye Drug
Mehta v. Ocular Therapeutix, Inc., 955 F.3d 194 (1st Cir. 2020)
On April 9, 2020, the First Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an action brought against a biopharmaceutical company, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc., and certain of its officers, regarding statements concerning the Company’s manufacturing processes. The Court held that plaintiffs failed to allege facts giving rise to a strong inference of scienter (i.e., fraudulent intent) and thus failed to adequately plead a securities law violation.…
Cornerstone Research Report Shows Continued Rate of Federal Securities Litigation Filings Targeting Pharmaceutical Industry
A recently-published annual report from Cornerstone Research demonstrates the continued focus by the plaintiffs’ securities litigation bar on pharmaceutical, healthcare, and biotechnology firms.
The report notes that 2019 federal securities filings (excluding merger objections), against Consumer Non-Cyclical companies, primarily composed of pharmaceutical, healthcare, and biotechnology firms, were at record levels. Specifically, federal filings in the biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare sectors increased from 56 in 2018 to 63 in 2019.…
District Court Judge Partially Dismisses Claims Against Celgene, But Allows Allegations Regarding Misleading Statements About Sales Projections and FDA Approval to Proceed
In re Celgene Corp. Sec. Litig., 2019 WL 6909463 (D.N.J. Dec. 19, 2019)
On December 19, 2019, Judge John Michael Vazquez of the District of New Jersey partially denied a motion to dismiss a putative securities class action complaint filed against biopharmaceutical company Celgene and certain of its executives.
Plaintiff’s allegations relied heavily on purported information from former Celgene employees, consultants, and scientists, and arose out of Celgene’s statements concerning three drugs that Celgene was developing as revenue replacements for its blockbuster multiple myeloma drug, Revlimid, which has a patent set to expire in 2022. Judge Vazquez analyzed allegations relating to each drug in turn.…